Companies Act, 2013

Adjudication, Compounding & Prosecution

A comprehensive guide to understanding defaults, offences, and the legal framework — from in-house adjudication to Special Court prosecution.

Framework Overview

Three Pillars of Corporate Offence Management

The Companies Act, 2013 classifies every default along three fundamental axes — determining punishment type, whether settlement is permitted, and whether police can arrest without a warrant.

Penalty vs. Fine / Imprisonment

Penalty means in-house adjudication via the Registrar of Companies. Fine or imprisonment means adjudication by a court of competent jurisdiction.

🔓

Compoundable vs. Non-Compoundable

Offences punishable with fine only, or fine or imprisonment, are compoundable. Those with mandatory imprisonment alongside fine are non-compoundable.

🛡

Cognizable vs. Non-Cognizable

Only offences amounting to fraud under Section 447 are cognizable — police may arrest without prior court permission. All others require court sanction.

How offences are routed

Penalty Track
In-House Adjudication
Registrar of Companies (RoC)
Authority: RoC → RD (Appeal)

Section 454 — Adjudication

RoC issues SCN, provides hearing opportunity, and passes order with reasons. Appeal to Regional Director within 60 days.

Fine / Imprisonment Track
Court Adjudication
Special Courts / NCLT
Fine only: Compoundable | Fine & Imprisonment: Court

Section 441 — Compounding / Prosecution

Fine ≤₹25L: Regional Director. Fine >₹25L: NCLT. Fraud (Sec 447): SFIO / Special Court. Non-compoundable offences go to court directly.

No Penal Provision? Where no specific punishment is provided, the general penal provision under Section 450 applies — fine not exceeding ₹10,000, with a further fine of ₹1,000 per day for continuing default.

Section 454

Adjudication of Penalties

The in-house adjudication mechanism empowers the Registrar to impose penalties directly — without involving courts — making it faster and more efficient.

Step-by-step adjudication process

1

Show Cause Notice (SCN)

RoC issues notice asking why penalty should not be imposed. Natural justice demands proper opportunity to be heard.

2

Reply (15-30 days)

Noticee submits reply electronically within the specified period. Physical appearance only if RoC directs.

Electronic Reply Mode
3

Oral Representation (optional)

If noticee desires oral hearing, appearance in person or via authorised representative may be granted.

4

Order with Reasons

RoC passes order within 30 days (no appearance) or 90 days (where person appeared). Penalty cannot be below statutory minimum.

Cannot be below minimum penalty
5

Payment & Publication

Penalty paid through MCA portal. Order copy sent to Central Government and published on website.

6

Appeal to Regional Director

If aggrieved, appeal must be preferred within 60 days. RD's decision is final and binding under the Act.

60-day appeal window

Key provisions & concessions

Small / Start-up Company Concession

For OPC, Small Company, Start-up Company and Producer Company, penalty shall not exceed one-half of the penalty specified — significant relief for smaller entities.

Default Rectification — Zero Penalty

Where default relates to non-filing of Annual Return or Financial Statements, and is rectified within 30 days of SCN, no penalty shall be imposed and proceedings are deemed concluded.

Factors Determining Quantum
  • Size and nature of the company
  • Nature of business carried on
  • Injury to public interest
  • Nature and repetition of default
  • Disproportionate gain or unfair advantage
  • Loss caused to investors or creditors
Key Advantages
  • Simple, quick, not riddled with court procedures
  • De-clogs courts and NCLT significantly
  • Built on natural justice principles
  • Only triggered after formal SCN by Registrar
Section 441

Compounding of Offences

Compounding is a settlement mechanism allowing the offender to pay a sum in lieu of prosecution — avoiding litigation and criminal record for procedural lapses.

What is compounding?

Compounding is a statutory settlement mechanism by which the offender pays a determined sum in lieu of prosecution, avoiding lengthy litigation. Authority lies with NCLT or Regional Director based on the fine amount.

Important conditions

Cannot be compounded if investigation is initiated or pending under the Act

Similar offence can only be compounded once in 3 years

If compounded before prosecution, no prosecution shall be instituted

If compounded after prosecution filed, ROC notifies court and accused is discharged

Order must be filed with ROC within 7 days of receipt

Jurisdictional split: Maximum fine up to ₹25 lakhs → Regional Director. Above ₹25 lakhs → NCLT. Application first filed with ROC who forwards to appropriate authority.

Compounding procedure

1
File application with RoC

Company and/or officers file the compounding application with Registrar.

2
RoC forwards to appropriate authority

RoC prepares comments and forwards to RD (≤₹25L) or NCLT (>₹25L).

3
Hearing by RD / NCLT

Authority scrutinizes application, schedules hearing, applicant appears.

4
Compounding order passed

Order specifying compounding sum is passed. Applicant must follow all directions.

5
Payment & filing within 7 days

Pay fee and file certified copy with RoC within 7 days of receipt.

6
Submit to Magistrate (if prosecution ongoing)

Submit order proof for discharge. If Magistrate doesn't discharge, file Revision Petition u/s 397 CrPC within 90 days.

Prosecution Framework

Cognizable vs. Non-Cognizable Offences

Under Section 439, the nature of offence determines who can initiate prosecution and with what urgency.

Cognizable Offences

Police can arrest without warrant. Relates exclusively to fraud under Section 447. SFIO or Court handles investigation.

Sec 7 — False info at incorporation
Sec 34 — Mis-statement in prospectus
Sec 36 — Fraudulently inducing investment
Sec 447 — Fraud (6 months–10 years + fine)
Sec 448 — False statement in documents
Non-Cognizable Offences

Court must grant permission before police investigate. Complaint filed by RoC, member, or Central Govt. person.

Who can file complaint?
› Registrar of Companies (RoC) › Shareholder or member of the company › Person authorised by Central Government › SEBI-authorised person (securities matters)
Remedies for the accused
› Apply for compounding › File Revision Petition u/s 397 CrPC Writ Petition under Article 226 › Appear before Special Court (Sec 435)
Quick Reference

Penalty & Offence Reference Table

Common defaults and their classification, authority, and compoundability at a glance.

Default TypePunishmentCompoundable?AuthorityLimitation
Non-filing Annual Return (Sec 92)PenaltyIn-houseRoCWaived if filed within 30 days of SCN
Non-filing Financial Stmts (Sec 137)PenaltyIn-houseRoCWaived if filed within 30 days of SCN
Fraud — Section 447Fine + ImprisonmentNon-compoundableSFIO / Special Court6 months to 10 years
False statement (Sec 448)Punishment under Sec 447Non-compoundableSpecial CourtCognizable if fraud element
Non-compliance (general — Sec 450)FineCompoundableRD / NCLTGeneral provision applies
Failure to register charges (Sec 77)Fine or ImprisonmentCompoundableRD / NCLTDepends on fine quantum
Default in holding AGM (Sec 96)FineCompoundableRD (≤₹25L)3-year bar on repeat
Common Questions

Frequently Asked Questions

Key legal questions arising in practice around adjudication, compounding, and prosecution under the Companies Act.

No. Under Section 454, the process is triggered only by the RoC through a Show Cause Notice. The company cannot proactively file an adjudication application — it is initiated upon detection of default.
No. Section 454 explicitly states the penalty cannot be less than the minimum provided. The officer has discretion within the range, guided by factors like company size, nature of default, injury to public interest.
The RD's decision is "final and binding" within the Act framework. However, constitutional remedies remain — writ petition under Article 226 (High Court) or Article 32 (Supreme Court) if the order is arbitrary or ultra vires.
Yes. No bar under Section 441 against joint application by company and officers. NCLT and RDs generally accept such applications as it reduces procedural multiplicity.
Nuanced area. The 3-year restriction applies to "similar offence." Courts have differing views on joint applications for same offence across years. Safer approach: single combined application disclosing all years transparently.
Not expressly mandatory, but most NCLT benches and RDs require evidence of good faith — practically meaning the default should be made good before or at hearing time.
No. Compounding only provides relief from prosecution for the specific offence compounded. It does not remove other consequences like director disqualification (Sec 164), MCA portal restrictions, or obligations under other laws.
Depends on whether the NED meets "officer in default" definition under Section 2(60). NEDs who received SCN must individually apply — the company's order doesn't automatically cover officers. NEDs can argue they weren't responsible by virtue of their position.